Article Metrics

Article abstract view : 4962 times
PDF full text: 2551 times

The Impact of Family Control on Dividend Policy: Evidence from Indonesia

Lukas Setia-Atmaja

Abstract


This paper examines the relationship between family control and dividend policy in Indonesia. There are three possible explanations for the relationship. The expropriation hypothesis predicts that family control has a negative impact on dividend payouts. Meanwhile the reputation hypothesis and the family income hypothesis predict that family control has a positive impact on dividend payouts. Using a panel data of Indonesian publicly listed firms in the period of 2003-2009, the results shows that family control has a significant negative impact on dividend payouts, dividend yields and likelyhood to pay dividends. The results control for other variables that may potentially affect dividend payments such as growth opportunity, debt, profitability, firm size and firm age. From agency theory perspective, the finding is consistent with the argument that family controlling shareholders prefer lower dividends, in order to preserve cash flows that they can potentially expropriate (the expropriation hypothesis).

Keywords:
Family Control, Dividends, Agency Theory

https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.9.2.147-156


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aivazian, V. & Cleary, S. (2003). Do emerging market firms follow different dividend policies from U.S. firms? Journal of Financial Research, 3, 371-387.

Anderson, R.C. & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.

Chen, Z, Cheung, Y.L., Stouraitis, A., & Wong, A.W.S. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 431-49.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.

Easterbrook, F.H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74, 650-59.

Faccio, M., Lang, L.H.P. & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91, 5478.

Fama, E. and French, K.R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 3-43.

Gomes, A. (2000). Going Public without Governance: Managerial Reputation Effects. Journal of Finance, 55, 615-646.

Gugler, K. (2003). Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D, and capital investment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1297-1321.

Isakov, D. & Weisskopf, J.P. (2015). Pay-out policies in founding family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 330344

Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeover. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.

Jensen, G., Solberg, D, & Zorn, T. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt, and dividend policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 247-263.

Johnson, S, Boone, P, Breach, A. & Friedman, E. (2000a). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 141-186.

Johnson, S, La Porta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. (2000b). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90, 22-27.

Kennedy, P. (2003). A Guide to Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55, 1-33.

Myers, S. (2000). Outside equity. Journal of Finance, 55, 1005-1037.

Pindado, J, Requejo, I, de la Torre, C. (2012). Do Family Firms Use Dividend Policy as a Governance Mechanism? Evidence from the Euro zone. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20, 413-431.

Rozeff, M. (1982). Growth, beta, and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research, 5, 249-259.

Schmid, T, Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, C. & Achleitner, A-K. (2010). Controlling shareholders and payout policy: Do founding families have a special taste for dividends?, CEFS Working Paper No. 2010-1. 2010.

Setia-Atmaja, L. (2010). Dividend and Debt Policies of Family Controlled Firms: The Impact of Board Independence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6, 128 - 142

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.

Silva, L.C., Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2004). Dividend Policy and Corporate Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

Villalonga, B. & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management, affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.

Yoshikawa, T. & Rasheed, AA. (2010). Family Control and Ownership Monitoring in Family- Controlled Firms in Japan. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 274-295.






Copyright (c) 2017 Lukas Setia Atmaja

International Research Journal of Business Studies has been covered by the following services:

   
  
Image result for university of Saskatchewan small logo